The
review process includes 5 stages:
- Developing the research question
- Developing the search
- Selection/screening of articles
- Appraisal of articles
- Synthesis, writing and publishing
1. The first stage in a review is the development of the research question.
The research question accurately and succinctly sums up the review's line of
inquiry. First, you need to search frameworks for your review. Then, search for
existing reviews. Similar reviews can help with identifying your search
terms, and information on your topic. Finally, get specific information on how
to perform a review in your field of study by referring to guidelines.
2. When you had developed the research question,
you can begin searching. The search process includes the following aspects:
- formulating a search strategy
- identifying search terms
- selecting sources to search
- documenting the search strategy
- staying up to date with search results
3. Begin the screening process by screening titles and abstracts. Then
you will need the full text of an article for more detailed screening.
You should consider:
- appropriate study population (age, geography, illness)
- appropriate intervention/method/measurements
- comparable environment/ population
- language - can the article be sourced/translated in the language required?
When reviewing the full text of the article, consider:
- appropriate method/measurement
- appropriate sample size
- duplication of data (avoid counting the same data twice)
- access to data not included in the article if required
4. Critical appraisal tools will help you to check the
validity and accuracy of article information. Also, it explains Reporting
Guidelines which assist in performing a study according to best practice
guidelines. On this web site you can see examples of guidelines on different
topics: The Equator Network.
5. The way a review article
is written can differ depending on the audience, discipline and type of review.
Two of the best known guides available to assist with this process are: - Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers Manual
These guides relate to systematic reviews written to the specific Cochrane
or JBI style. These review styles are typically considered to be at a higher
standard.
Considering your audience and publication priorities are an important part
of developing a publication strategy for your review. You also should:
- Develop a publishing plan
- Evaluate quality
- Consider open access options
- Manage your digital identity
- Communicate your research
Always remember to follow author guidelines when you submit your
manuscripts.
Visit deakin.libguides.com/systematicreview for more information.